A pullback in credit and a demand for higher collateral requirements stemming from the shift to higher interest rates and increased credit risk could trigger a downward cascade in financial markets — creating a vicious cycle of reduced spending, investment and growth. We put forward a scenario for how a sudden disruption in credit markets could affect portfolios, especially given indications of the market’s fragility.
Scenario narrative
A sudden economic downturn exacerbated by a rise in interest rates precipitates a credit shock. Companies already operating on thin margins and (often) within sectors facing structural challenges struggle to meet their debt obligations.
At the same time, there is a pullback in credit and a demand for higher collateral requirements. As investors allocate away from credit exposure, credit spreads widen. Contagion moves into the equity markets, particularly into companies with high leverage, high short-term borrowing and weak balance sheets.
To evaluate this scenario, we look at past crises driven by macroeconomic events.[1] We use a broad equity-market sell-off of 25%, which corresponds to the historical average loss over these types of events.
From a factor standpoint, companies with high leverage and low earnings quality will be affected more than the broad market under our scenario. Regional banks, a key source of credit for businesses and real-estate financing in their local areas, will be hit harder as many have significant exposure to commercial real estate and small to medium-sized enterprise lending, both vulnerable to a credit shock.[2] These banks may face liquidity risks that force them to sell assets at depressed prices, further weakening their financial position.
For the 10-year U.S. sovereign yield, the historical data shows a wide range of potential outcomes. We have a yield drop of 75 basis points (bps) in our scenario, as the economy faces headwinds.
Scenario definition
Portfolio implications
To evaluate the scenario’s impact on multi-asset-class portfolios, we apply MSCI’s predictive stress-testing framework to a hypothetical portfolio consisting of global public and private equities, U.S. bonds and U.S. private real estate.[3] Such a portfolio loses 17% under the credit scenario.[4] Consistent with the narrative, equity-market sectors, such as real estate and consumer discretionary, sell off more sharply than others. More generally, cyclical sectors and small-cap stocks underperform the broad market, while defensive sectors, low-volatility and high-quality stocks sell off less sharply.
Portfolio impact by asset class, sectors and styles
Scenario path
While the effects above are based on “instantaneous” repricing, the risk from any scenario is not just one number: Scenarios unfurl over a trajectory, not a single instance. This consideration is crucial for effective planning, portfolio adjustments and maintaining alignment with financial goals. To account for this fact, we used MSCI Fabric to simulate 2,000 potential paths, parameterized to match the average loss of 25%, a time to bottom of around nine months and a time to recovery of approximately 16 months.[5] The exhibit below shows the median and the envelope around it to give a sense of how this scenario may play out.
Simulated paths for US equity-market performance under a credit-crisis scenario
Commentary
If the market is fragile when the credit crisis occurs, the scenario’s effects will be more severe, and markets will hit bottom more quickly. The center of fragility for the credit scenario is illiquidity, which forces prices down as demand to sell hits the market. The major source of the illiquidity is private credit.
When it comes to risk, private credit hits the trifecta. Being credit, you get the distributional characteristics you least want. Being private, you are in a more opaque market and valuations can be subjective and infrequently updated, masking underlying financial distress. And it is illiquid, with lockups of years. The liquidity issues stem from private credit because investors have no other choice but to disproportionally liquidate their public-credit holdings to achieve their desired reduction in overall exposure. The larger the private market, the greater the strain on public markets and the risk that prices cascade down.
This last point is key, because private credit, once a niche market, has grown rapidly and now commands over USD 1.7 trillion in assets under management. In the U.S., the private-credit market is currently comparable to the high-yield-bond and leveraged-loan markets in size.[6]
Fragility also can come from concentration and leverage, both of which currently are notable. Free cash flow less margin debt is at one of the lowest points in the past 25 years, and the market capitalization of the 10 largest stocks in the MSCI USA Index has surged to more than 30% of the total market cap of the index, approaching its highest level in the last 25 years.[7]
Credit risk is multi-pronged, affecting a wide swath of the financial markets directly, and indirectly through its effect on borrowing and security financing. With the recent surge in private credit, this extends even further, and in ways that are difficult to divine. Currently the credit markets appear unchallenged, but such is the nature of risk in these markets; there is little warning until a credit crisis is in full swing. The scenario analysis here provides some hooks to address a possible credit event in a portfolio.
The authors thank Dhruv Sharma for his contributions to this blog post.