In the third quarter of 2023, the MSCI ACWI Index was down 3.3%, as the persistence of recessionary fears alongside surging oil prices and elevated interest rates suppressed investor optimism. U.S. Treasurys had negative returns, with a 3.4% loss for the MSCI USD Government Bond Index over the last quarter as interest rates moved higher. Although equities were negative for the quarter, the MSCI ACWI Index was up 10.5% year to date. Because rising valuations have largely driven the equity market’s strong performance this year, investors have begun to watch for crowding in hot stocks and the potential for higher volatility. In this blog post, we compare equity-earnings and fixed-income yields within the context of their historical relationship and highlight high (low) crowding in low- (high-) quality stocks across regions and sectors.
Low equity/bond yield spread may tempt asset allocators to lower equity exposure
Real bond yields in the U.S., U.K. and eurozone remained substantially above their 10-year averages at quarter-end, and YTD returns in the government and investment-grade corporate sectors were below the rate of inflation.
In the interactive exhibit below, we show the spread between 12-month forward equity-earnings yields and 10-year real bond yields as a measure of relative value. In the U.S., bond yields had been lower than equity yields, but the spread has narrowed and is now significantly below the historical average. In other words, by this measure of relative value, U.S. bond-market valuations look low relative to equity valuations. In contrast, the relationship between bond and equity yields in regions other than the U.S. was close to the historical average.
U.S. bonds’ higher yields could tempt allocators to shift some exposure from equities to bonds. Before doing so, they may want to consider potential risks, including unexpected higher inflation and growing U.S. budget deficits.
The spread between US equity and bond yields is below its historical average
Does the market need stock-level crowd and quality control?
High concentration in the strong YTD performance of global equities has raised the specter of crowding risk — many investors’ chasing a narrow set of securities within the broad universe.
We can use the MSCI Security Crowding Model, which provides a crowding score for individual securities based on various time-series and cross-sectional metrics, to analyze the relationship of crowding, quality and performance. Looking back to 1995, we found that a portfolio of the most-crowded stocks (decile 10, blue bar) underperformed, on average, but the underperformance was magnified when the portfolio held the lowest-quality stocks (decile 10, yellow bar). In contrast, a portfolio of stocks with the lowest crowding scores and highest-quality exposure (decile 1, yellow bar) outperformed a portfolio of stocks based solely on a low crowding score (decile 1, blue bar).
High crowding and low quality have been a losing performance combination
The following exhibit lists the top eight and bottom eight securities in each sector across regions. The quadrant analysis combines each stock’s crowding score and quality exposure in each sector and region. In general, stocks in the top-left quadrant (negative quality exposure and high crowding score) provide investors more reasons for caution.
Regional snapshots of securities’ crowding scores and quality exposures
India was the only positive among the top developed- and emerging-market countries
The MSCI broad-market indexes were down across all regions and major countries, with India being the only exception. Among the factor indexes, the MSCI Value, Yield and Low Volatility Indexes outperformed in most regions. The climate, ESG and thematic indexes posted flat to negative returns across almost all regions.
Value, low-volatility and yield indexes led in most regions in Q3 2023
What the MSCI Adaptive Multi-Factor Allocation Model indicates
Our adaptive multi-factor framework is a model designed to analyze factor-based decisions. Our research suggests the value in taking a holistic approach to factor assessment. This approach encompasses the macroeconomic environment, as discussed above, as well as factor valuations, recent performance trends and risk sentiment.
As of Sept. 30, the MSCI Adaptive Multi-Factor Allocation Model showed an overweight to value and a slight overweight to low volatility, relative to an equally weighted factor mix, as shown below.
Exposures from MSCI Adaptive Multi-Factor Allocation Model
