Global equity markets remain highly concentrated, creating headwinds for active managers to express their best ideas and manage portfolio risk. Using the MSCI Security Crowding Model and the related factor built into the MSCI Global Equity Factor Trading Model, we demonstrate how portfolio managers can better identify the securities potentially most vulnerable to future de-rating.
Additionally, we show how to translate these pure factor perspectives into a practical portfolio-construction technique. This approach could be particularly relevant to strategies with a strong sentiment exposure.
Identifying stocks vulnerable to de-rating
Stocks with a high MSCI integrated crowding score can be thought of as representing a “happy hunting ground” for companies vulnerable to de-rating. These stocks tend to be more expensive, riskier and highly traded, with sentiment and multiples that have increased sharply relative to their own history as well as to the market.[1]
The associated crowding factor focuses on the time-series aspect to better fit into an equity risk model. Any such clash is further reduced by neutralizing it against familiar standard factors — in practice, it is the momentum exposures that are largely removed. Therefore, stocks flagged by the crowding score, and which also score highly on the crowding factor, could be sold from a portfolio without fighting against the momentum factor. Indeed, the portfolio could benefit from the factor return earned from the reversion of stock valuations.
This last point is borne out by our findings that show the crowding factor has steadily generated negative returns for MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index (IMI) constituents since 1997 (this result is resilient to changes in region[2]). Decile portfolios show a near-monotonic relationship between a higher crowding factor and negative excess return.
Higher crowding factor exposures are associated with negative returns
This relatively slow-moving signal has had predictive power not only in the next month, but also, materially, in the second and third months.[3] Stock-specific residual volatility follows an analogous trend over these horizons.
Crowding factor has had a predictive power over a three-month horizon
Integrating crowding scores into portfolio construction
Purely in factor terms, the difference between the information in the score and the factor-model exposure can be seen in the quintile return spreads, especially in the dot-com bubble’s bursting, the 2008 global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Historically, the crowding score has been more volatile than the crowding factor
Since the realized crowding score correlates with its input components, its long-short return spread reflects all of their influences, especially, momentum’s. In contrast, the key influence on the model factor’s return is the mean reversion of stock valuations.
Correlation of crowding score with select equity factors
How might a portfolio manager directly control the aggregate “de-rating risk” in their portfolios? We begin by looking at the underlying signals. With time-series value as the key driver of the crowding factor’s strong returns, and given value and momentum’s well-known historical relationship,[4] we would expect to see an improvement in the behavior of the momentum factor when it is combined with information from a crowding score.
We established this by adding a crowding score in a customization of our long-term factor models and observed how momentum’s behavior shifted across time and regions.[5]
Time-series crowding-score signals improved behavior of momentum factor
A two-factor alpha is not needed to consistently incorporate this finding in portfolio construction. Instead, we can use a simple constraint based on the crowding score. We constructed a monthly rebalancing strategy that maximizes, at the portfolio level, the momentum exposure with a predicted tracking-error limit of 3% and a time-series crowding score below that of the market.[6] In the long run, this simple time-series approach using a crowding-score-based constraint has produced favorable risk/return outcomes because it helps ensure that stock selection within high-momentum quintiles avoids overbought stocks.
A simple crowding-score constraint improved risk/return outcomes
The score constraint applied to high-momentum scores also enforces a strong average underweight of the crowding factor (active -0.5 standard deviation for this period and universe) because of the neutralization. The neutralization prevents the equivalent factor-based constraint delivering the same control.
A simple constraint on crowding score forces a strong control on the crowding factor
The crowding score and a control on momentum
In concentrated markets, investors can become wary of portfolios dominated by sentiment factors. We have shown how the crowding score can help investors identify securities most at risk of de-rating. Uncrowded, high-momentum stocks have performed well, while crowded, lower-momentum stocks have been vulnerable to price correction. We also translated these insights into a simple constraint that has historically improved momentum-based strategies, leveraging the well-known value/momentum interaction.